Blog
Affordable Health Care for America Act Clearinghouse
Posted by Admin on October 29, 2009
UPDATED: 11/17/09

Read the bill
: You can read a copy of H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, by clicking here (PDF). You can also read a copy of the Manager's Amendment to the bill here (PDF).

Section-by-section analysis: The House Energy and Commerce Committee has produced a section-by-section analysis of the bill, which you can read here (PDF).

Share your thoughts: Please share your thoughts about this effort to offer every American access to quality, affordable health insurance by submitting a comment below. You can also submit feedback by filling our Congressman Schauer's constituent survey on health insurance reform.

Schauer statement on the bill (11/7/09):

"Today I was proud to cast a vote in favor of the Affordable Health Care for America Act because it will offer every single American access to quality, affordable health insurance, strengthen Medicare for seniors by closing the prescription drug donut hole, and lower health care costs for Michigan businesses to help them compete. Additionally, this legislation and accompanying measures will reduce the federal deficit by $109 billion over the next ten years, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

"After talking to thousands of families, small business owners, doctors and seniors, it became clear to me that our current health care system is broken. Health costs for small businesses have skyrocketed 129% since 2000, and if we don't act now, health care costs for average Michigan families will continue to increase by $1,800 each year for the next ten years, seniors will continue to fall into the Medicare Part D donut hole, and rising health care costs will continue to add to the Federal deficit. This situation is unsustainable, and unacceptable.

"For families, this bill will help lower medical costs and offer peace of mind by preventing big health insurance companies from denying coverage due to a 'pre-existing condition' or the loss of a job. For seniors, it will offer greater security by closing the prescription drug donut hole, eliminating co-payments for preventive services and extending the life of the Medicare Trust Fund. And for small businesses - like the one my wife and I own - it offers tax credits and access to affordable group rates through a health insurance exchange, which will lower costs and allow entrepreneurs to re-invest in their business.

"Today's historic vote marks a major step towards repairing the economic damage done to families, seniors, businesses, and the federal deficit under America's broken health care system. It lays the groundwork for long-term economic growth, and a stronger, healthier America."


ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

Town Hall: Thanks again to the hundreds of people who attended our recent town hall meetings. If you weren't able to attend, you can download copies of our PowerPoint presentation and our health care handout here and here (PDFs)

What's in it for Michigan:
You can learn more about what's in the new health insurance reform bill for Michigan families, seniors and small businesses by reading this fact sheet (PDF), prepared by the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

Guide for seniors:
You can learn more about what's in the bill for senior citizens and people with disabilities by clicking here (PDF).

Guide for small businesses: To learn more about how health insurance reform will help lower health care costs for small businesses, click here (PDF).

What's in the bill for rural America: Learn more about how the bill will benefit rural Michigan families and small businesses by clicking here (PDF).

Who's supporting health insurance reform: Nonpartisan groups representing Americans from all walks of life have lent their support to this critical legislation, such as AARP, the National Security to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, Consumers Union, the American Medical Association, the American Cancer Society, and the National Farmers’ Union.

How the bill will reduce the deficit: You can read the latest cost estimate from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office here. Over the next decade, this plan will reduce the federal deficit by $109 billion.

MIT Study: Click here to read an independent study conducted by MIT economist Jonathan Gruber about how House Proposal Lowers Non-Group Premiums.

Q: Is health care reform constitutional? A: Yes. The 10th amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that the powers not delegated to the federal government by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states … or to the people. But the Constitution gives Congress broad power to regulate activities that have an effect on interstate commerce. Congress has used this authority to regulate many aspects of American life, from labor relations to education to health care to agricultural production. Since virtually every aspect of the heath care system has an effect on interstate commerce, the power of Congress to regulate health care is essentially unlimited.

HOW WILL HEALTH INSURANCE REFORM AFFECT YOU?



TOP 14 PROVISIONS THAT WILL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY


1. BEGINS TO CLOSE THE MEDICARE PART D DONUT HOLE — Reduces the donut hole by $500 and institutes a 50% discount on brand-name drugs, effective January 1, 2010.

2. IMMEDIATE HELP FOR THE UNINSURED UNTIL EXCHANGE IS AVAILABLE (INTERIM HIGH-RISK POOL) — Creates a temporary insurance program until the Exchange is available for individuals who have been uninsured for several months or have been denied a policy because of pre-existing conditions.

3. BANS LIFETIME LIMITS ON COVERAGE—Prohibits health insurance companies from placing lifetime caps on coverage.

4. ENDS RESCISSIONS—Prohibits insurers from nullifying or rescinding a patient’s policy when they file a claim for benefits, except in the case of fraud.

5. EXTENDS COVERAGE FOR YOUNG PEOPLE UP TO 27TH BIRTHDAY THROUGH PARENTS’ INSURANCE— Requires health plans to allow young people through age 26 to remain on their parents’ insurance policy, at the parents’ choice.

6. ELIMINATES COST-SHARING FOR PREVENTIVE SERVICES IN MEDICARE—Eliminates co-payments for preventive services and exempts preventive services from deductibles under the Medicare program.

7. IMPROVES HELP FOR LOW-INCOME MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES—Improves the low-income protection programs in Medicare to assure more individuals are able to access this vital help.

8. PROVIDES NEW CONSUMER PROTECTIONS IN MEDICARE ADVANTAGE— Prohibits Medicare Advantage plans from charging enrollees higher cost-sharing for services in their private plan than what is charged in traditional Medicare.

9. IMMEDIATE SUNSHINE ON PRICE GOUGING—Discourages excessive price increases by insurance companies through review and disclosure of insurance rate increases.

10. CONTINUITY FOR DISPLACED WORKERS—Allows Americans to keep their COBRA coverage until the Exchange is in place and they can access affordable coverage.

11. CREATES NEW, VOLUNTARY, PUBLIC LONG-TERM CARE INSURANCE PROGRAM—Creates a long-term care insurance program to be financed by voluntary payroll deductions to provide benefits to adults who become functionally disabled.

12. HELP FOR EARLY RETIREES—Creates a $10 billon fund to finance a temporary reinsurance program to help offset the costs of expensive health claims for employers that provide health benefits for retirees age 55-64.

13. COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS—Increases funding for Community Health Centers to allow for a doubling of the number of patients seen by the centers over the next 5 years.

14. INCREASING NUMBER OF PRIMARY CARE DOCTORS — Provides new investment in training programs to increase the number of primary care doctors, nurses, and public health professionals.

TOP 10 CHANGES IN H.R. 3962 FROM H.R. 3200 (the previous House bill)

1. REDUCES THE DEFICIT MORE—According to the CBO, the revised bill reduces the deficit by $30 billion over the first 10 years. (The original bill reduced the deficit by $6 billion over the first 10 years). The revised bill also continues to reduce the deficit over the second 10 years.

2. ENDS HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES’ BLANKET EXEMPTION FROM ANTI-TRUST LAWS—In order to open up health insurance markets to real competition, the revised bill ends insurers’ blanket exemption from anti-trust laws, bringing antitrust enforcement to the two most abusive practices of health insurers – price fixing and market allocation.

3. EXTENDS COVERAGE FOR YOUNG PEOPLE UP TO 27TH BIRTHDAY THROUGH PARENTS’ INSURANCE—The revised bill requires health plans to allow young people through age 26 to remain on their parents’ policy, at their parents’ choice.

4. CREATES A NEW, VOLUNTARY, PUBLIC LONG-TERM CARE INSURANCE PROGRAM—The revised bill creates a long-term care insurance program to be financed by voluntary payroll deductions to provide benefits to adults who become functionally disabled. The measure provides a cash benefit to help individuals with community-based services.

5. EXEMPTS SMALL BUSINESSES WITH PAYROLLS BELOW $500,000 FROM EMPLOYER MANDATE—The revised bill exempts a greater number of small businesses from the employer mandate – exempting 86% of all America’s businesses. Specifically, the bill exempts firms with payrolls up to $500,000 (instead of $250,000) from the mandate and provides only a graduated penalty for not offering coverage for firms with payrolls between $500,000 and $750,000 (instead of firms with payrolls between $250,000 and $400,000.)

6. LIMITS THE “HEALTH CARE SURCHARGE” TO MILLIONAIRES—Under the revised bill, only the wealthiest 0.3% of Americans would pay a surcharge on the portion of their income above $500,000 (instead of $280,000) for individuals and $1 million (instead of $350,000) for couples, in order to help make health insurance affordable for middle class families.

7. ADDRESSING GEOGRAPHIC VARIATIONS IN MEDICARE PAYMENTS/MOVING TO MEDICARE PAYMENTS REWARDING QUALITY AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS—The revised bill provides that the Institute of Medicine (IOM), through two studies, will make recommendations on how to fix the current Medicare reimbursement system, including addressing current geographic variations. Under the bill, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will implement the IOM recommendations on changes to Medicare payment systems unless disapproved by Congress.

8. BEGINS CLOSING THE MEDICARE PART D DONUT HOLE IMMEDIATELY—The revised bill moves forward the effective date of reducing the donut hole by $500 and instituting a 50% discount for brand-name drugs in the donut hole, from January 1, 2011 to January 1, 2010. It also completes elimination of the donut hole by 2019 (instead of 2024).

9. IMMEDIATE HELP FOR THE UNINSURED (INTERIM HIGH-RISK POOL)—To fill the gap before the Exchange is available, the revised bill immediately creates an insurance program with financial assistance for those who have been uninsured for several months or denied a policy because of pre-existing conditions.

10. HHS NEGOTIATION OF DRUG PRICES—Under the revised bill, the Secretary of HHS is required to negotiate drug prices on behalf of Medicare beneficiaries.
Comments
The opinions expressed below are those of their respective authors and do not necessarily represent those of this office.
  • James Low commented on 11/2/2009
    Like a great many of your constitutents, I am overwhelmingly opposed to this government takeover of our health system. If you read pages 92-94 of the latest version of the bill, H.R. 3962, you will find that after 5 years, in 2013, private health insurers will be prohibited from issuing any private policies, leaving only the government plan. Your existing policy is gone, probably much sooner than 2013. Page 111 establishes the Health Benefits Advisory Committee to set requirements for your health plan that you MUST purchase. Page 225 does not require Members of Congress to use the new health plan, so they will not, but YOU WILL be required to use it. Page 297 imposes a new 2 1/2 percent tax on any individual not buying a bureaucrat-approved health plan. Page 313 imposes an 8 percent tax on businesses that do not provide the bureaucrat-approved health plan. Page 520 cuts $150 billion from Medicare Advantage plans, like the one I currently have. Page 733 establishes the equivalent of the "death panel" like Britain's National Health Service to deny treatments that are deemed too expensive for the patient in question. The language in this bill in so convoluted (on purpose) that it makes it difficult for non-lawyers to follow what the specific meaning of a provision is. VOTE NO ON THIS TAKEOVER OF EVERYONE'S LIFE!
  • Karl Mantyla commented on 11/3/2009
    Thank God there is sanity in the House of Representatives. This bill sounds like a very good reform to the existing chaos of insurance company corruption, duplication of effort, overcharging and insurance denials. It also covers those who don't have coverage in meaningful, humane ways without breaking the federal budget. Thank you for supporting this bill. Let's hope the Senate also tunes into the health and financial needs of every American: fair, affordable health care with an focus on preventative medicine and coverage for the most needy.
  • John Anderson commented on 11/3/2009
    Do NOT vote FOR this so-called healthcare reform. The majority of voters want healthcare coverage reform not this socialism by proxy. Do NOT vote for this bill if you really want to honor your constituents' wishes.
  • erwin chrapek commented on 11/3/2009
    Please do not vote for affordable health care.The government should not be a provider.The prescription plan is a good example.To costly!I started out at 13dollors two years ago an next year i will have to pay 45 dollors.I am also against the energy bill.I think it is about time the government starts to down size.I think that these czars should be done away with also. e chrapek
  • Mats Holm commented on 11/4/2009
    Please vote Yes for health care. It's time to stop listening to scare tactics from people payed of by the very lucrative insurance industry. Of course they don't want to see competition, they don't any sunlight on prices and price fixes, and they don't want change, they make billions today and want to make billions tomorrow. But who is paying them all this money? We are, the American people that let them get away with it. Don't believe them when they try to make you believe that the big bad government will come and take away all your choices and make every decision for you. You might have health care now, but what if you're laid off, plant closes or management decides that they can no longer provide health care for you. Then you will see how things are on the other side. You're trying to survive on unemployment pay and your kid breaks his leg running around in the back yard, bam, $5000. What if you are working minimum wage, no insurance and you trip and fall? Is that the American dream to have to give up everything because you got hurt? Please vote YES.
  • Gary Nielsen commented on 11/4/2009
    I encourage you to vote no in H.R. 3962. It is time for you, for the first time in your careers, to listen to the people of this country and slow this “health care reform” process down and think this through from a variety of directions – consumers, health care providers, insurance companies, affordability, tax impact on the economy, cost in American liberty to chose, etc. There is NO CRISIS - There are approximately 305 million people living in this country. · 84.6% have health care 258 million · 5.6% can afford to buy it, but don’t 17 million · 3.0% are illegal aliens 10 million · 2.6% are between 18 & 34 yrs; young and healthy 8 million · 3.9% cannot afford/can receive treatment at hositals 12 million The uninsured are not always to the same people because they are between jobs and generally are without health care for short periods of time. The most telling information comes from several polls and has been consistent over the years (84% to 89% satisfaction) – 85% of those who have health insurance are either satisfied or very satisfied with their insurance coverage. Why do we need to nationalize our health care and nationalize 17% of our nation’s $14 trillion economy and change the current care that at least 85% of our covered citizens like?
  • James Closser commented on 11/5/2009
    I urge you to LISTEN to what the people are saying and rethink your position on HR 3962. There are things that need to be done to reform healthcare, and things that can be done, but this bill is not the means to the end.
  • David E. Francis commented on 11/5/2009
    I am urging you to vote "yes" on HR 3962. While it does not go far enough to help those Americans who are unemployed, underemployed, or homeless; it is a start. I, myself, would prefer to see a Health Care system similar to those that exist in Europe. (Paid for by higher taxes on salaries and wages.) I saw on cable news the segment of the 'protest' thursday afternoon by Sen. Bachman and Rep. Boehner. I thought it was extremely disgraceful and contemptable to attempt to associate this health care bill with the policies of the Nazis during WWII. The poster equating HR 3962 with the Dachua, (and other death camps), was disrespectful and unamerican. That Sen. Bachman and Rep. Boehner WOULD NOT OBJECT to such crude displays shows, in my opinion, that they do NOT deserve to be in the U.S. Congress.
  • Lowell Greene commented on 11/6/2009
    Do you know why yearly physicals are not covered by Medicare and will that be changed with H.R. 3962. Just think of the money that could be saved by the early diagnois of many cancers, heart disease, diabetes etc. It is totally beyond me why such and exemption is a part of Medicare. Not covering yearly physicals is just plain nonsense because it costs many more millions of dollars to treat deseases after they have gotten a head start.
  • Richard Heiser commented on 11/6/2009
    If you have any interest in representing the best interests of your constituents you will vote no on HR 3962. Michigan cannot absorb more mandates, more direct or indirect taxation and more Federal Debt. Your vote for HR3962 will be treating Michigan the same as treating a drowning person with a glass of water. Please use common sense and vote no!
  • Kathleen Hastings commented on 11/6/2009
    We do not want our tax dollors to fund abortion. We are strongly opposed to any attempt to pass the health care bill, H.R. 3962, under a 'closed rule,' and I urge you to vote 'No' on the anticipated closed rule. Please support your fellow Congressional Michigan Democrat, Bart Stupak, and support the Stupak Amendment, which would remove the abortion-funding provisions from the bill.
  • Chris Ellinger commented on 11/6/2009
    Thank you for the courage to put citizens' health before insurance company profits. This is a good step toward providing quality health care to all Americans. There is no reason why health care in America can't be as available and affordable as it is in all other advanced countries. I am especially glad to see a provision that will require HHS to negotiate drug prices and save the taxpayers millions. It's about time! Keep up the good work.
  • Rachel Baker Ford commented on 11/6/2009
    Mr. Schauer, I have read with great interest your assessment and support of the Health Care Reform Bill. I applaud your support of the constituents of Michigan 7th, and for us all. We have heard so much ugly rhetoric, relating the Bill. Mr. Francis (above) states the feeling and thoughts so many of us here in Texas have. I was born and raised in Wayne and received my college degrees from Western Michigan. Your courage and good work make me proud to be a Michigander among the Texans. As Editor of the Garland Area Democratic Voice, I am including your words in our next edition.
  • Dess Johnson commented on 11/7/2009
    Thank you for helping alter the climate in Washington regarding Health Care Reform. Please keep that courage and vote yes on HR 3962. It's time to end countless discriminatory practices built into our current system.
  • David Kehn commented on 11/7/2009
    I strongly urge you to reconsider you position on the health care bill. I believe it would be a terrible mistake for the country. This present bill is MUCH WORSE than doing nothing. This is not the change we need. Thank you for the opportunity to contact you in this manner.
  • Lorraine Tsutsui commented on 11/12/2009
    What good is insuring everyone but not having competent doctors to care for them? This health reform bill could drive competent doctors out of medical care by making it impossible to keep up with the cost of their liability insurance and litigation costs from suit-happy patients. This bill has nothing in it about the skewed law practices concerning frivolous lawsuits that is driving up the cost of insurance. It is too short-sided. There are good provisions such as encouraging employer health programs. Why couldn't you reps stick to positive provisions like that?
  • Joe Welch commented on 11/12/2009
    Hopefully the Congress of the United States will rethink the scope of this "Health Care Reform", and limit their meddling. Allowing interstate competition among insurance companies, catching and prosecuting fraud at all levels, and reducing administrative costs would be a good refinement to a system that is not "broken", but instead is the finest system in the world!
  • Thomas Jones commented on 11/12/2009
    The House Bill that was passed looks great! Much better than I expected; thank you for the many hours everyone in the House dedicated to making this bill. It helps our people who need better health insurance and it helps our country's economy. It also will be very helpful for those of us working on preventing suicide and related problems. Thanks, and our prayers are now with the Senate to do as well.
  • Beth Thorrez commented on 11/13/2009
    Like most Americans, I believe that I and my doctor are in a better position to decide what medical treatments i may need than the federal government. This takeover will lead to the loss of individual freedom and decision making.
  • Mark Dayrell commented on 11/13/2009
    By voting for this bill you have shown a complete disregard for the limitation of powers granted to the Federal government by The Constitution of the United States of America. The Federal Government has no power to require citizens to purchase anything. You promised to uphold the Constitution in your Oath of Office and have violated that oath by voting in favor of this bill.
  • Joel Fulton commented on 11/13/2009
    Most of us see this for what it is. When the House of Representatives voted to pass this legislation it was compared to the historic creation of the Social Security System and Medicare. That pretty much says it all. Both of those systems are broken and failing and this program will be no better. The reason our health insurance industry is what it is today is because of heavy government regulation. The system can be fixed without inserting another bloated government bureaucracy which will also fail and cost more than any of us can afford. This will put the final nail in the coffin of our financial collapse!
  • Jacob Davis commented on 11/13/2009
    We all believe that health reform is necessary. No one is arguing that. But please, vote no for this bill. There are other ways to reform health care. Smaller incremental steps should be the way to go. Huge spending, with no idea how the change will look, no concrete idea how much it will cost, and no idea how it will effect the economy, is not a responsible approach to something this huge and complicated. The more this bill progresses, the more it sounds like a vendetta against the insurance industry. There is no way to know for sure how this will affect the economy. What happens when the government puts insurance people out of work with the public option taking their jobs? They will be unemployed or working for the government. The health industry is 1/3 of the U.S. GDP. This is nothing more than government expansion at a time when the funds don't exist because of unemployment. To mandate something onto the citizens is nothing more than communism.
  • Robert Parrish commented on 11/13/2009
    If this plan is so good, why did you not require all PUBLIC employees be covered by this plan? What is good for the employers should be better for the employees!
  • John Shipman commented on 11/13/2009
    I believe you are a decent man with good intentions but totally misguided. You say you have read the entire bill which (if true) puts you in the minority. Your job is to uphold the constitution. Have you read that? Congress has no business running health care and if you look at the success rate of other government run programs you'll see what your reform will look like. Socialism will never work no matter what you call it. Please stand with your constituents. We don't want this!
  • charles goostrey commented on 11/14/2009
    Just wondered will you and the rest of congressmen be on the same insurance that the general public will have, and pay the same as we do.
  • Arda Collins commented on 11/14/2009
    There are many reasons why I am against the current health care reform bill but the main reason is that we simply cannot afford it. If corruption could be cut out of the current programs that we already have, why not go ahead and do it??? It's obvious that taxes will be raised on people who are already struggling or by the government printing more money making the dollar worth less and less. I think that those who believe only the "rich" will pay are not using common sense. I think if politicians were really serious about improving health care, they would address crossing state lines to buy insurance and frivolous lawsuits.
  • Mark Foeller commented on 11/14/2009
    How in the world will this bill make health care "affordable" (for those of us who won't get government subsidies to pay for our health insurance)?? This bill mandates that we MUST purchase coverage similar to current health coverage, EXCEPT: (1) pre-existing conditions must be covered, (2) no limit on hospital in-patient days covered, (3) no limit on inpatient mental health / substance abuse coverage, (4) no annual limit on overall coverage, (5) no lifetime limit on overall coverage, (6) children covered up to age 27 (even if they're not full-time students), (8) preventive care covered 100% with no co-pays, and (9) dental, vision, and hearing coverage for children to age 21. The average cost of employer-based family health insurance coverage in 2008 was $12,298. How can government force us to buy BETTER coverage, and claim it will be "affordable"?? Better coverage for less cost? Where's the magic wand that will make this happen?
  • Arlea Norton commented on 11/15/2009
    Our freedom will be lost due to these types of proposals. We do not want the government owning what belongs in the private sector. I totally believe what this administration is trying to do to the people of Michigan and the rest of America is unconstitutional. Vote no on this bill. I believe in reform when it comes to access, availability and tort reform. We do not want to grow a bigger government. The government would most assuredly put us into a far deeper deficit. When I look at social security, and Medicare, I can see clearly how this would also turn out. I say no to the corruption and waste that is inevitable. We do not want to be 'owned' by the government. Please leave our health care alone.
  • Cheryl Prell commented on 11/18/2009
    Regardless of how you look at this the doctors are the ones that are going to be affected the most, in cost of doing business, lower reimbursement and increased health coverage rates for their staff. If anyone in Washington believes that our premiums won't go up because of this, you are fooling yourselves! Having worked for insurance companies and physicians for 20+ years it is the insurance companies and the drug companies that need to be reformed along with the malpractice suit limits. These are the costs that are out of control and the companies that continue to force more work on the physician practice with less reimbursement. If this reform passes in it's current state you will see thousands of physicians across the country leaving their practices and closing their businesses.
Post a Comment
Fill out the fields below to submit a comment